|
UNIVERSITIES RETREAT IN WAR ON CHEATING
Too few universities are willing to back up their professors
when they catch students cheating, according to academic observers.
The schools are simply not willing to expend the effort required
to get to the bottom of cheating cases and they are afraid
of lawsuits, according to Rutgers University professor Donald
M. McCabe.
McCabe is founder of the Center for Academic Integrity at
Duke University and has researched the incidence of cheating
on campuses since the 1960s.
The center is a 7-year-old consortium of 200 colleges and
universities working to foster academic honesty through the
involvement of students, faculty and administrators.
• McCabe reports that 87 percent of students surveyed
in 1993 admitted to cheating on written work and 70 percent
cheated on a test at least once.
• Some 49 percent collaborated with others on an assignment,
52 percent copied from someone and 26 percent plagiarized.
• Copying from material on the Internet is on the rise,
he says, and students often don't recognize that copying is
plagiarism.
McCabe says that professors are becoming more intimidated
by students, and worry about offending them and making them
unhappy. "This stuff comes out of the '60s and it's gotten
worse," he warns.
Faculty are also worried that if they challenge a student,
it is they -- not the student -- who will wind up being put
on trial. Student after student has told him that those who
engage in academic dishonesty "will size up a professor
to determine whether they can get away with it."
McCabe suggests that one way to thwart cheating is to require
an outline of a paper early in the term, then a synopsis at
about the middle of the course, and the full paper at the
end of the term. He also counsels the assignment of unique
topics that cannot so easily be copied.
Source: Carol Innerst, "Universities Retreat in War on
Cheating," Washington Times, January 29, 1998.
TEST FRAUD ON SAT
NEW YORK - Test fraud is alive and well and a sports magazine
reports that top high school basketball recruits such as Zendon
Hamilton of St. John's and Avondre Jones of Fresno State cheated
on their college entrance exams.
In this week's Sports Illustrated, an article titled "Troubling
Questions" details how several high school stars managed
to cheat on their SATs and ACTs with the help of high school
coaches, recruiters and "middlemen."
While most of the people involved in the Hamilton and Jones
cheating scenarios deny wrongdoing, Nate Cebrun, a self-described
"sports consultant" who spent 30 days in jail for
his part in providing merchandise to Florida State athletes
in the 1994 Foot Locker scandal, says he was the "middleman."
In Hamilton's case, SI reported that on nine occasions in
1993-94, the highly-recruited 6-foot-11 center from Floral
Park, N.Y., failed to score the minimum on his SATs the NCAA
required for freshman eligibility.
On the 10th try, Hamilton passed, but only after he traveled
from New York to Los Angeles, met with Cebrun for his "SAT
tutoring program" the night before the test and took
the exam at Lynwood High School, where Cebrun's brother once
served as principal.
Cebrun told SI he had "passed on the name of this 'tutoree'
to someone who works in Lynwood's testing program so there
would be a safety net." Cebrun told SI that the insider
would make the proper adjustments or additions to Hamilton's
answer sheet before it was sealed and returned to the Educational
Testing Service (ETS).
Cebrun said he was paid $2,000 for making sure Hamilton passed
the test. SI also reported that two other men were with Cebrun
and Hamilton the night before he took his final SAT -- Greg
"Shoes" Vetrone, then an assistant at Cal-Irvine
and now in the same position with UNLV, and Gary Charles,
coach of Hamilton's AAU team.
Hamilton's father George told SI "the allegation that
Zendon was involved in any wrongdoing with SAT tests is totally
false."
Jim Wallace, a vice principal who has supervised the administration
of the SAT at Lynwood for 14 years, told the magazine that
orchestrated fraud at his testing center was "impossible.
Ridiculous. This is a test center, not a cheat center."
Vetrone, and several unnamed coaches, told SI that Lynwood
was notorious for test fraud.
Cebrun told SI he also helped Jones, a 1993 McDonald's High
School All-America, pass his SAT. Jones has gone from Southern
California to Chaffey College in California back to USC and
is now set to play for Fresno State this season.
SI says Jones took his SAT at Lynwood, improving a non-qualifying
score of 630 by 460 points in two months. Jones told SI his
test score was investigated and validated by ETS.
According to ETS, about 1,000 of the two million SAT answer
sheets it processes each year are invalidated on suspicion
of cheating. American College Testing (ACT) told SI is has
a similar rate.
CHEATING IN THE AIR FORCE
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE, Va. (ACCNS) - A technical sergeant
assigned to the Air Combat Command Inspector General Team
was convicted in a general court-martial May 31 of cheating
before taking the Promotion Fitness Examination in 1997 to
test for master sergeant.
There were two specifications alleged against the member,
both for violation of a lawful general regulation under Article
92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The regulation
was Air Force Instruction 36-2605, Air Force Military Personnel
Testing System, which sets forth the rules for preparing for
the PFE.
The technical sergeant was acquitted of possessing an actual
copy of the 1996 E-7 PFE, but convicted of using or reviewing
actual test material and/or illegal study materials in the
time period leading up to the 1997 E-7 exam. The jury sentenced
him to 90 days hard labor without confinement, a reduction
in rank to staff sergeant, and a reprimand from the commander,
Ninth Air Force.
"This case will have consequences for the member even
beyond the sentence imposed," said Capt. Wendy Carroll,
1st Fighter Wing Staff Judge Advocate chief of military justice.
"He is a convicted felon, and that may have an impact
later on in his life."
Marcia Hilsabeck, an English teacher at Round
Rock High School in Texas, chuckles when recalling how one
of her students printed a research paper off the Internet,
created a title page, and turned in the assignment. He was
unaware the web address (URL) of the site he plagiarized was
printed in the top corner of every page he downloaded. Hilsabeck
nabbed him.
ETHICS STUDENTS CAUGHT CHEATING
25 San Diego State Students Caught Using Quiz Answers; All
Given 'F' In Biz Ethics Class
SAN DIEGO, Calif., Posted 12:29 p.m. April 30, 1999 -- Twenty-five
San Diego State University business students got an "F"
for cheating. The class? Ethics. About a third of those enrolled
in a business ethics course were caught using answers to a
quiz last month. All were given failing grades for the course
and most were placed on probation. The scandal was reported
this week in the student newspaper, The Daily Aztec, and in
today's San Diego Union-Tribune.
"What did I learn? Obviously not to cheat. It's not worth
it," one student told the Union-Tribune. Lecturer Brian
D. Cornforth said he set a trap to catch cheaters after receiving
a tip that students were using answers they culled from tests
given to an earlier session of the class. "A line must
be drawn in the sand," he said. "This is just too
egregious, it's too heinous a cheating scandal."
Julie Logan, the university's judicial procedures officer,
said the case was unusual because of the number of students
involved. "Most of my cheating cases are just one person
making the decision to cheat on their own," Logan said.
COLD-BLOODED CHEATING
There is nothing funny about drug abuse. And nobody takes
it more seriously than Beth Lindamood. Really she does. Even
if she makes you laugh at the same time. She has compiled
a Letterman-esque list of the Top 10 Dumbest Ways Employees
Try to Disguise Drug Abuse. "Everything on the list is
something people have actually tried," she says. Here’s
one from the list: Substituting a "fresh" 40-degree
urine sample. "The lab concluded that either he was submitting
someone else's refrigerated urine or he was a corpse."
|